Browse Options

Straßenbaumaschine/Road Construction Device, Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), 31 March 2009

A patent infringement action may not be rejected on the grounds that a feature of the asserted patent claim seems to be unclear in its technical meaning. A lack of clarity may only give reason to limit the feature to the narrowest reasonable meaning.

Click here for the full text of this case. A summary of this case will be posted on http://www.KluwerIPCases.com.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comment Preview

  1. says: