Browse Options

Safety Device for Car Occupants, Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), 30 April 2009

For an invention to be considered obvious it is usually necessary that there are additional incentives that go beyond the identification of the technical problem and lead the person skilled in the art to search the solution for this technical problem on the path of the invention.

Click here for the full text of this case. A summary of this case will be posted on http://www.KluwerIPCases.com.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comment Preview

  1. says: