In this case, the Federal Court of Justice considered the value of a secondary indicium for a decision on inventive step. The FCJ confirmed that if an invention differs from the decades-old general practice in the relevant technical field, then this may be an auxiliary criterion supporting inventive step.

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law

image_pdfimage_print

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *